BrandDunk

Branding the World of Sports

Archive for the ‘Sponsorship Deals’ Category

New York Times only tells half the story

Posted by ZA on April 5, 2009

The New York Times piece by Eric Pfanner titled, “When the Attention isn’t Worth it” misses the mark.  While true that companies need to spend wisely when it comes to sports sponsorships, that doesn’t mean they should eliminate them when times are tough.  The article is critical of the sports sponsorship deals cut by companies that that are part of the government bailout, and specifically points out excessive spending by AIG and RBS.  But the article fails to point out the importance these sports sponsorship deals have in a company’s marketing plan.  It also doesn’t mention that some of these deals are proven money makers, like some of the deals that Bank of America was criticized for by Congress.

Sports sponsorships are a vital component of many large companies marketing plans.  They are equally as important as other forms of advertising and public relations.  They play a big role in building the brand of the companies that use them.  I think the Times & Pfanner need to paint a more complete picture of the subject, not just focus on the dollars being spent.  They need to report the dollars that are being generated as well.

Posted in Endorsement Deals, Sponsorship Deals, Sports Marketing | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Gatorade sponsors Plays of the Week on NBA.com

Posted by ZA on March 23, 2009

Now you can visit the “G Moments” page on NBA.com to watch and vote on the NBA plays of the week.  Gatorade is the presenting sponsor of this promotion, which is where the “G” in “G Moments” comes from.  Using “G” is sort of a play on words because it stands for Gatorade, but also is slang for “Gangsta” which can be used to describe a great player or particular play.

Click here to watch Gatorade’s “G Moments” on NBA.com.

New Gatorade Logo

New Gatorade Logo

Gatorade has been a sponsor of the NBA since 1984, which includes the NBA, WNBA, NBDL and USA Basketball.  The “GMoments” promotion on NBA.com is another vehicle that will help create awareness for the new Gatorade brand.  The new Gatorade logo is prominently displayed on the page along with a few of their new taglines like Gatorade Fierce’s new “Bring It”.

Posted in Gatorade, NBA, Sponsorship Deals | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

AIG loses their shirt…literally

Posted by ZA on March 18, 2009

The news for troubled insurance giant AIG has not been kind lately.  When the most powerful man in the free world is angry with you, that is never a good thing.  And President Barrack Obama did not mince words this week when he said he was angry at AIG over their handing out bonuses to top executives.

So how does a brand respond to the crisis?  How is AIG responding to this current crisis?
It appears AIG is doing a whole lot of nothing.  This article from AdAge discussed what PR steps AIG could take to help their current situation.  Even the PR experts admitted this situation is going to be extremely tough for AIG to rebound from, because money spent on a PR campaign to win back consumer hearts and minds will likely be viewed as more excess.  AIG did not respond to questions sent by AdAge on the story.

Making it worse for AIG is that while they take their duck and hide approach to handling this crisis, one of their biggest marketing opportunities just ran away.  News came out that AIG is losing its shirt sponsorship with soccer club Manchester United.  The deal which AIG has held since 2006 will not be renewed after the 2010 season is done.  While on the surface it might seem great for AIG to rid themselves of a $25+ million dollars per year team sponsorships, it is a big loss for AIG.

Manchester United is one of the most popular football (i.e.- soccer) clubs in the world.  Man U jerseys (or “kits” as they are called in soccer) are worn by their fans across England, Europe, Asia and the United States.  Wikipedia reports that Manchester United has over 330 million supporters worldwide, which is almost 5% of the Earth’s population.  Assuming it is true, that means that one out of every twenty people on this planet count themselves as a support of this soccer team.  That means there are millions upon millions of people walking with Man U jerseys with AIG on the front.

Is it worth $25 million dollars per year for AIG to get that type of brand exposure? I think so; and some smart company is going to jump at the chance to pay Man U even more in their next jersey sponsorship deal.  CNN reports that Indian conglomerate Sahara and Saudi Telecom are already interested and I bet a few American corporations give it a close look.  Nike, are you listening?

So AIG is not saving $25 million dollars per year, they are losing brand exposure on a global scale.  The richest club in all of professional sports, with the largest fan following in sports, is wearing your company name on their chest; and you give that up?  Makes no sense to me, it seems like they could have cut corners on some other marketing deals in order to maintain the relationship with Manchester United.  But alas, it is just another blunder in a series of missteps that AIG has made lately.

Posted in Apparel & Shoes, Soccer, Sponsorship Deals, Sports Brands, Sports Marketing | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Wells Fargo walks away from PGA sponsorship

Posted by ZA on March 18, 2009

Wells Fargo’s acquisition Wachovia is not only walking away from their sponsorships with the PGA Tour, they are walking away and leaving money on the table.  Some of Wachovia’s deals with the PGA Tour are through 2014, but Wells Fargo still made the decision to give them up.  The reason Wells Fargo is giving up the PGA Tour is that consumers are seemingly unhappy with the failed financial company (Wachovia) still spending money on sports sponsorships.  This bowing down to public perception occurred even though Bank of America has come out recently with data in support of their sponsorships of sporting events.

pgatour_logo

More at SportBusiness on Wells Fargo pulling the plug on their sponsorships of the PGA Tour.

Posted in Golf, Sponsorship Deals | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Bank of America is making money off sports marketing

Posted by ZA on March 16, 2009

Why all the fuss about Bank of America spending on sports marketing? People have been complaining about BOA’s spending on sports endorsement deals and sponsorships because BOA took government bailout money.  They took TARP money, but Bank of America is making money from their sports marketing deals.  Let me repeat that, Bank of America is reporting that they are MAKING MONEY from their sports marketing deals.  So it appears those that criticize BOA’s spending, might not really know all of the facts; perhaps they should have listened to the BOA CEO before passing judgment.

Bank of America CEO, Kenneth Lewis, says they make “Ten dollars ($10) in revenue and three dollars ($3) in earnings” for every one dollar ($1) they pump into sports marketing deals.  Lewis went on to say that the money Bank of America spends on sports marking “is not wasted money.”

I don’t know much about how Bank of America runs their business, but it does appear their support of sports has been lucrative for their business.  They are making a 300% ROI (profit) from investing in sports, which you take every time in the advertising world  So perhaps the politicians in Washington will refrain from wagging their tongues on the matter, until they at least have some facts to support their criticism.

Bank of America’s Sports Sponsorships
include:

* Major League Baseball
* Nascar
* NFL
* PGA golf
* US Olympic Team

Read more on BOA’s sports sponsorships on their website.

Posted in Sponsorship Deals, Sports Marketing | Tagged: , , , | 4 Comments »

GM cutting ties with College Hoops after 25 years

Posted by ZA on March 2, 2009

Reported by SportBusiness that General Motors (GM) will most likely not renew their sponsorship of the NCAA Tournament after the 2009 season.  That would end a 25 year sponsorship relationship between GM and the NCAA.  GM was reportedly spending over $75 million per year in advertising during the month-long NCAA Tournament.

Wow, that’s a huge sponsorship loss for the NCAA.  It is going to be tough for them to find one partner to replace all that GM did, because it will take a big corporation (most are hurting right now) and can’t be a alcohol company (AB, Miller and Coors are shut out).

Posted in College Basketball, Sponsorship Deals | Leave a Comment »

Rules for Endorsement Deals during a Recession

Posted by ZA on February 22, 2009

The stock market is straining, banks are failing and most of the World’s economies are sputtering.  The downturn is causing many companies to cut back on their marketing budget, but you can’t stop everything.  You still have a product to sell; you still have a brand to build.  For years companies like Nike, Adidas, Coke, Pepsi, McDonald’s and Gillette have furthered their brands by investing heavily in sports sponsorships and endorsement deals.  Now, the question facing those companies and many others is, do we continue to spend on endorsement deals even during a recession?

recession_sign2

The answer is unequivocally yes.  If you have built your brand on sponsorships and endorsement deals, then pulling out is going to stunt that growth.  Big companies need to market their brand, their competition will pass them by if they only focus on ROI.  That’s because ROI marketing is building your coffers today, while brand marketing is going to increase your earnings capacity down the road.  But if you are a company that has built your brand on the back of sports sponsorships and endorsements, there are new rules to play by during a recession.

1. Take risks. Now is the best time to land that one big deal that has always alluded you.  That venue name sponsorship, signing up a mega sports star to an endorsement deal or aligning your brand with a professional sports league.  Do it now!  Why?  Because money is cheap right now so you can buy more than you normally could.  Leagues, teams and athletes are trying to generate more cash right now, just like the rest of us.  So that deal you were quoted at X price in 2007 is now attainable at half X price.  Citigroup’s $20 million dollars per year naming rights deal at Citi Field in New York raises eyebrows today, but in the long-term that deal will help to grow their business.  Although Citigroup is probably wishing they inked that deal today rather than 2006, if they did they could have probably gotten the deal at 30% less than they paid.

2. Drive a hard bargain. Don’t accept the first offer and don’t be afraid to walk away.  These rules should apply for negotiations during prosperous times as well, but many people don’t have the guts to walk away from a deal.  The key difference today is there is less competition bidding on the deal you want, so if you walk the deal might fall apart entirely.  The guy on the other side of the table knows that, so he’s more likely these days to agree to your terms.  And just because you are getting a really good deal (say $0.50 cents on the dollar) doesn’t mean you cannot get a great deal (maybe $0.20 cents on the dollar).  You never want to burn bridges, but that does not mean you cannot push to get the best deal possible.  The best way to save money on these deals is to not pay more than they are worth in the current economy.

3. Maximize your current deals. Don’t spend so much time looking for your next deal that you forget about the deals you’ve already got.  The same way new deals are more negotiable during a recession, so too are elements of your existing deals.  Asking for more in your current deal is not akin to breaking the deal.  In fact you may be surprised how many more miles you can get out of existing deals just because your partners have the inventory available.  Well that, and the fact that they don’t want to risk losing your deal.  Remember these words: don’t be afraid to ask.

So use these rules to help guide you through the troubled times we’re living in.  Doing so will insure that your brand stays strong through the recession, and help you position yourself to grab market share from the competition once the economy is strong again.

Posted in Endorsement Deals, Sponsorship Deals, Sports Brands | Leave a Comment »

Super Bowl commercials a good investment

Posted by ZA on January 26, 2009

Good article from AdAge about the value of a commercial during the Super Bowl.  While many scoff at spending $3 million dollars on one 30 second commercial during the Super Bowl, there is a lot of value that can be derived.  The key is to make sure the campaign stacks up beyond the commercial.  There needs to be sufficient support behind the spot to make sure consumers are being engaged after the spot is done.  Most Super Bowl advertisers are now bringing the viewers to their website in order to expand upon the commercial they aired.

Reasons to advertise during the Super Bowl:

* The Super Bowl is an event where the viewers are excited to see the commercials.  No one speeds through them or leaves the room when they are on.  So it is a chance to get across a message that will be willingly received by millions of potential consumers of your product.

* The buzz around Super Bowl commercials goes well beyond the game.  The media covers the spots that will air before the game kicks off, and then rates them afterwards.  Millions of dollars of additional exposure are picked up by advertisers of the Super Bowl from the additional media spotlight on the commercials.  Then you also have to add up the residual benefits of being a part of the water cooler conversation in every office in America.  The next day people are talking about the Super Bowl commercials – which they liked, which ones they disliked.  That conversation is invaluable to the brands that paid for Super Bowl spots.

* The internet is a big key to effective Super Bowl advertising.  Many of the marketers paying for a spot in the big game are using creative web campaigns or viral marketing campaigns to keep the conversations going after the game ends. Hyundai said they gained 25,000 viable leads from visitors to their website after the 2008 Super Bowl.  Lead generation is a huge reason to play a Super Bowl ad.

* The Super Bowl is the ultimate brand builder.  Established companies like Anheuser-Busch use the game to further their brand in consumers minds.  People already know A-B brands like Budwesier, but the Super Bowl ads give A-B a chance to create feelings towards their brand.  Or A-B can expose consumers to a new story about their products or brand.  The Super Bowl acts as “king maker” towards up-and-coming companies that advertise during the big game.  The brands of GoDaddy, CareerBuilder and SalesGenie were put on the map by the advertisements they ran during the Super Bowl.  GoDaddy has ridden their Super Bowl success to almost 50% market share in their category.

So when you are watching the big game this Sunday, remember to think about the brands that are making a statement when the commercials come on.  You are going to help make or break that $3 million investment from the company advertising during the Super Bowl.

Posted in NFL, Sponsorship Deals, Sports Brands, Sports Marketing, Sports Television | Leave a Comment »

Did Under Armour default on deal with Cubs?

Posted by ZA on January 23, 2009

This appears to be turning into a case of ‘he said, she said’ between the Chicago Cubs and Under Armour. The argument is whether UA reneged on a sponsorship deal they signed with the Cubs or the Cubs cancelled the deal. The original deal was supposed to be 3-years and included in-stadium signage for Under Armour on the outfield walls at Wrigley Field.  2009 would have been the third year of the deal.

The Cubs fired first saying that UA was backing out of the deal and reneging on a promised extension. Supposedly Under Armour sent a letter to the Cubs in December saying that they would not pay for the deal in 2009.

Now the Sports Business Journal reports that Under Armour responded that the Cubs are the one’s who cancelled their deal. A Under Armour spokesman said the Cubs wanted to renegotiate before the original deal was done, and the two sides could not agree on an extension.  UA says that then the Cubs were the one’s that cancelled the third year of their original 3-year deal.

Who to believe in this situation? I would guess that both sides have a point, but it sounds to me like the Cubs might have accepted a verbal agreement that UA is not willing to honor anymore (the 5-year extension).  The fallout from that seems to have prompted someone to cancel the remaining year on their existing deal.  My guess is court documents will reveal shortly whether that was Under Armour or the Cubs.

The question in my mind is that if Under Armour defaulted on their sponsorship deal due to poor performance.  Could that be a sign that they are in bigger trouble financial (given the current economic crisis) than they are letting on.  And could that mean that my predicted acquisition of Under Armour by Nike could happen in 2009.  Stay tuned…

Posted in Apparel & Shoes, MLB, Sponsorship Deals, Stadium Signage | Leave a Comment »

NBA changes ad decision on liquor

Posted by ZA on January 22, 2009

“Better the devil that you know than the devil that you don’t know.”  I think that expression is apt for this story.

Due to the tough economic times the NBA has decided to reverse its ban against in-stadium liquor signage.  The ban prevented liquor advertisements from being located courtside, or anywhere else in the stadium that could wind up being seen on a television broadcast.  Teams were previously allowed to sign deals with liquor companies, but had to restrict the signage to areas out of view of tv cameras.

The NBA is not the only league to go down this path.  Major League Baseball, Nascar and the NHL all have previously overturned this same regulation in their own leagues.  They now allow liquor advertisers to position themselves so that they will appear on those leagues television broadcasts.

Although these decision are assuredly not popular with organizations like MADD, they are necessary to keep new sponsor dollars coming in during this recession.  Liquor sales are not going to be greatly impacted by the downturn, so that segment is one of the few that has sponsorship dollars to spend.

I can’t blame the NBA, in these tough financial times you have to do whatever is possible to stay afloat.  They are choosing to take the dollars available to them rather than face the unknown consequences of not getting that money.

Posted in MLB, Nascar, NBA, NHL, Sponsorship Deals, Sports Marketing, Stadium Signage | 2 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.