BrandDunk

Branding the World of Sports

Archive for February, 2008

Lakewood Amphitheatre name returns for Atlanta venue

Posted by ZA on February 16, 2008

Atlanta’s top outdoor concert venue is returning to its original name, Lakewood Amphitheatre.  The change was a result of the naming rights deal with HiFi Buys expiring.  Lakewood Amphitheatre was the original name of the venue when it opened in 1989, but had been known as HiFi Buys Amphitheatre since 20o1. HiFi Buys is an electronics retailer located in the Southeastern US.  Prior to the deal with HiFi Buys, the amphitheatre had a deal with Coca-Cola to be called the Coca-Cola Lakewood Amphitheatre.

 Visit the official site of the Lakewood Amphitheatre in Atlanta.

Posted in Venue Information, Venue Naming Rights | Leave a Comment »

Upgraded L.A. Coliseum will remain home of USC football

Posted by ZA on February 13, 2008

An article from the Los Angeles Times indicates that the University of Southern California Trojans and the Los Angeles Coliseum have worked out an agreement to keep USC playing football games at the Coliseum through 2030.  The agreement still needs to be ratified by both sides in order to be binding.  Prior to this agreement being reached there was talk that Pete Carroll’s Trojans might move their home games to the Rose Bowl, thus sharing that venue with UCLA. 

The agreement stipulates that there will be major upgrades to the Coliseum.  Improvements to the facility will probably include upgrades to the concessions, press area and restrooms, the addition of luxury seating and upgrades to the video screen and electronics within the stadium.   Part of which will be paid for by the Coliseum Commission selling the stadium naming rights on the L.A. Coliseum.  But any renovations performed on the Coliseum will have to be in compliance with upgrades made on historical landmarks because the L.A. Coliseum is a National Historic Landmark.

The Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum in a 90K person bowl-shaped stadium that first opened in 1923.  During its existence it has had a few facelifts and many tenants.  The Trojan football team are the only current tenant, but there is hope that these facility upgrades might make the Coliseum a suitable possibility for a Los Angeles NFL team.  It is also a centerpiece in the city of Los Angeles’ bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics.  The L.A. Coliseum was the host venue for the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles.

Link to the official website of the Los Angeles Coliseum.

Posted in College Football, Stadium Construction, Venue Information, Venue Naming Rights | 1 Comment »

How to improve attendance at the Frank Erwin Center?

Posted by ZA on February 12, 2008

The University of Texas is my alma mater and I’ve always been a big supporter of UT athletics. During my years supporting the Longhorn sports, one of the on-going topics has been ‘how to improve attendance at UT basketball games’? Fans have debated it, journalists have written about it and coaches (particularly Rick Barnes) have fretted over it. My opinion is it will only take a few simple steps to fix attendance at the Erwin Center for UT basketball games.  But the first thing we need to do is understand the goal.  Are we just trying to get more revenue?  Are we trying to get more butts in seats?  Are we trying to create a more lively atmosphere?  Or all of the above?  My goal is to focus on getting new people to the games, which will ultimately help cure all three items mentioned above.  Some great advice I once received was, “it’s not how big your piece of the pie is, it’s about making the whole pie bigger”.  That applies here because we want to focus on making the games a great “experience” so more people will try them.

1) Give non-season ticketholders better options for tickets. Currently only upper-level seats are available to purchase for single games. All of the lower-level seats are owned by season ticket holders, or are assigned to students. For more than half of the games on the home schedule you could take away a large portion of the seats allotted to students, and sell those to regular fans. My suggestion would be to takeaway the top half of the lower-level student sections (sections 27/28 & 42/43, on each end of the court), and sell those to the general public.  Charge an aggressive price, like $15 to $20, to entice more fans to try UT games.  Those games would include all non-conference games and a few of the lesser conference games. I attend all of the home games and it is obvious that the students do not fill up their allotment of lower-level seats for most games. This would be the solution to get those seats filled, and at least give the lower portion of the FEC a full crowd.  Plus, the new fans you’d expose the games (better seats at lower price point) will become regular patrons.

2) Increase student attendance at games, by engaging them better on campus. With more than 50K students at UT, it shouldn’t be a problem to get a fraction of them to games.  The issue is how you target those students.  First, get more signage on campus on gameday. Make sure students are aware of dates and times of the games. Also, make it possible for students to “draw” their tickets on-campus rather than just at the FEC. Also, try to engage student groups in order to get them to the games. Every single game should have 3-4 groups who are featured guests at the game. Block off an upper-level section for them, and find ways to engage them in the game. Let their leaders compete in the in-game entertainment games down on the court (half court shot, shoe race, etc). Rope off a special “concessions area” for them just outside their section on upper-level where they can buy unique, and possibly discounted, food & drinks. Really challenge the different student groups (Greeks especially) to get out to certain games. Provide a reward to the one’s who show best attendance, like use of a suite for the final game of the year.

3) Better distribution of concessions. I’m not going to suggest they change the concession provider, but that would help. Atleast hire more vendors to work the aisles selling food & refreshments. Currently they walk around with cotton candy or snow cones. That’s it. I’m attending a dozen plus games a year at the Erwin Center. Many of these games are after work. So make it easy for me to relax and get some decent food & beverages.  Plus, selling more concessions raises revenue and it makes the whole “experience” better.

4) Engage the Austin business community. Develop programs to get different businesses and/or organizations to the game. Corporations aren’t going to buy & use the crappy upper-level seats. But involve them in a buy & donate program, where they purchase the tickets that are going to be donated to a worthy group. The tickets then would be provided to non-profits, schools, or other organizations who will attend and enjoy the free perk.  Every game should have businesses and community groups in attendance, even if there seats are in the upper-level.  Again, a solution to make the event seem more custom is to provide the group their “own” concessions area and/or private tent.  A business might be willing to overlook the fact that their seats are upstairs, if they pick up some additional networking perks.  I envision a tent for pregame, in-game and postgame that has ammentities similar to what you’d find in a suite (i.e.- better than concession stand food & alcohol).  Companies can then turn it into an event.  And if their people aren’t wowed by the seats, they’ve also got the option to retreat to their private tent a few steps away in the concourse.  Yes, some of these folks will camp out in here watching the game on TV, but the first step to increasing attendance is making it an “experience” for more people to attend the games.  Eventually you’ll convert those folks into regular, screaming fans if you get them to the games.

5) Get people into the building quicker at the beginning of games.  Open a few more doors, make sure the electronic scanners are working and staff a few extra “purse checkers”.  Train the staff on how to move quickly to get people inside.  Also every good game, there are long lines of people waiting outside the FEC’s Will Call window to pick up their tickets. Many of them are students who are required to scan their ID’s at the stadium in order to get student tickets. This should not be allowed to go on because it’s a huge deterrent to fans. Who’s going to show up and wait 45 minutes in line, thereby missing the first 10 minutes of the game? More importantly, who’s going to ever return to see another UT game after going through that experience? Fix the problem. Provide separate, and easy to use, pick up options for students. Tie it into an online system where all students can quickly check availability of seats for the game.

6) Market them games better in Austin and Centex. Make the million plus people in Centex fans of the UT basketball team.  UT has very marketable players, so make sure fans know these guys. Names like DJ Augustin, Damion James, AJ Abrams, Conner Atchley and Justin Mason should be on the tips of people’s tongues.  And they should also know the younger generation of players, like Gary Johnson, Dexter Pittman and Clint Chapman.  Get players pictures on posters and TV spots.  Work with the media outlets to get more “human interest” stories for players on the team.  Get the players out to more schools to try to develop rabid support from younger fans.  If fans know the players, then they’ll want to show up to see them play.

7) Quit complaining about the attendance at UT home basketball games.  I’ve heard it the names and excuses for years.  The Erwin Center is ‘a morgue’ or a ‘vacuum’.  The fans are all ‘blue hairs’ who don’t let you stand up at the games.  The students should be closer to the court, to make more noise. The fact is that UT averages a decent crowd for every home game. People are complaining because they see open seats, or they want a more lively atmosphere. Well this ain’t Duke. Show up and support the team, and quit worrying about some things no one can change…like the fact that UT fans prefer football to basketball.

A funny thing happened on the way to this post, as I was writing the AAS came out with an article that details how attendance is up at the Erwin Center.  So it sounds like things could already be headed in the right direction.  Now we just need to get a few more of the things above going and the Erwin Center will be a better atmosphere for college basketball.

Posted in College Basketball, Improve Attendance | Leave a Comment »

Best & Worst Super Bowl XLII Commericals

Posted by ZA on February 9, 2008

Everyone watched them, lots of companies have ranked them. But here is my quick breakdown of the best & worst commercials from the 2008 Super Bowl. Taking in to mind, not only which spots were the most creative, but also which ones moved the needle.

Funniest
* Bud Light Breath Fire & Flying
* Bridgestone Squirrel
* Fedex Pigeons
* Cars.com Death Match – although they should have stopped at one commerical.
* Doritos Mouse Trap – Might have been the best spot in the Super Bowl.
* AMP Jumpstart

Moved the Needle
* GoDaddy Danica Patrick – read my thoughts on this spot here.
* SalesGenie (2 spots) – I thought they did a good job in presenting the value of their product.  Since then they have pulled the Panda ad because apparently it offended some people.
* Taco Bell Fiesta – The spot wasn’t great, but the introduction to their new meal was well timed.
* Audi Godfather – Internet searchers have been scrambling to find the price of the new Audi R8 this week. It was a top search term on Yahoo Buzz.

Most Creative/Innovative
* Dell Red – Hardly focused on the product, but developed a catchy ad.
* Tide Stain – Again, they didn’t show their hand too early. They let the bit draw in the watcher, and then hit them with the product at the end.
* Life Water Thriller – They could have saved money and just had the dancing lizards.
* Justin Timberlake Pepsi – Kept me guessing until the end. Although they could have shortened it.
* Bridgestone Headlights – Richard Simmons done right.
* NFL.com SuperAd – Compelling spot that had watchers waiting to see the outcome.

Bad
* UnderArmour Athlete – Didn’t do much to feature the product.
* Planters Unibrow – That was the best creative Planters could buy?
* T Mobile Barkley/Wade – Why pay all of that money to not really say anyting unique?
* Vitamin Water Horse Race – In the Super Bowl of Water matchup, Life Water was the big winner.
* Coca-Cola Carville/Frist – I get it Coke, but did most of America? No. Tried to be too cute and failed.

Worst
* CareerBuilding Spider – Just bad on some many levels.  Waste of money for them.
* CareerBuilder Heart – It was eyecatching, but also a major turnoff to millions of people snacking during the game.

Posted in NFL, Sports Marketing | 1 Comment »

Why can’t the Hornets sell any tickets?

Posted by ZA on February 9, 2008

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that Dallas Mavericks owner, Mark Cuban, recently took a few shots at the New Orleans Hornets. The “swats” at the Hornets were in-regard to their difficulty selling tickets to home games. So far this season the Hornets are averaging around 12K fans per game, and they need to average more than 14K per game by end of next year to stay in New Orleans.

Cuban said, “Somebody’s got to get off their ass and sell tickets. There’s enough fans to get 16, 17,000 people to come, even if they’re weekend games.” Cubans right, the issue here is the teams lack of effort to generate buzz about their team. They aren’t connecting with the local residents, the business community in New Orleans or tourists visiting the city.

“Whatever it takes to get people in the arena, you gotta do it and that’s what they’re not doing done there.” stated Cuban.

The positive news is that the Hornets currently have approximately 6500 season ticket holders. The Hornets ticket office is offering cheap seating, some as low as $10.00 per seat in the upper-level.  And they offer several affordable mini-plans.  Plus, the team has some exciting young stars like Chris Paul and most important the Hornets have been winning.  Even though they are in the brutal Western Conference, they’ve managed to hold up really well against their competition.

But they’ve had to come from behind the eight ball from as well.  Most notably they had to play the last two seasons away from New Orleans as the city recovered from Hurricane Katrina.  While the played in Oklahoma City they were known as the New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets.  And this season, the Hornets started with TV blackouts in certain regions of New Orleans, due to a contract dispute with Charter Communications. And they also lost their VP of Ticket Sales right at the start of the year.

So why can’t the New Orleans Hornets sell more tickets? Here are a few reasons:

1)Their owner, George Shinn, is not a good NBA owner.  He has a reputation for being cheap, and has shown an unwillingness to pay star players their market value.  During his tenure with the team in Charlotte he alienated the fan base with a series of moves, most which were motivated by greed.  But some that just showed his horrible judgement in how to handle himself.  So it’s hard to imagine the fans in the Big Easy are going to be loyal to a team that has an owner at the helm with such a sorted history.  An owner who moved his team once, and has already flirted with another city (OKC).  In short, Shinn is viewed as a scumbag by most of the fans.  George Shinn’s bio is prominently displayed on the Hornets site, and raises questions with me about what kind of family man he is.
2)They are not winning the state. They play 3rd fiddle behind the Saints & LSU. LSU is the sports team in the state. And the Saints are the team for New Orleans. The Hornets need to tap into those ravenous fanbases, especially LSU. Market the team in Baton Rouge. They state that getting Baton Rouge is a goal, but they haven’t made enough push into that market. Offer special deals to Tigers Alums. Get some former LSU stars involved in the Hornets. If they get the LSU fan base, they could increase numbers dramatically.

3) No one recognizes the players. Get the community and state to relate to the team. Don’t market the opponents so much, instead try getting people behind the stars you have on your own team. Chris Paul, Tyson Chandler, etc. need to be the focal points of all marketing efforts. It’ll start slow, but eventually pay off big.  And most importantly the Hornets need to pay whatever necessary to retain their brightest stars, like Chris Paul.  Are you listening George Shinn?  The fans will resist connecting if they think the player they show the love will be gone soon (think Baron Davis).

4)Apologize for OKC. It was unfortunate that the team ever had to move as a result of the Katrina tragedgy.  But the Hornets relocated to Oklahoma City for last two years and even wore jerseys with Oklahoma City on them.  The fans in OKC embraced the Hornets as their own, and Shinn open flirted with the new city.  That’s hard for any fan to see – you’re team sporting the identity of another city.  Everyone should be thankful that OKC opened their hearts to the visiting team, but now the Hornets (and Shinn) need to reaffirm their unconditional love for Louisiana and New Orleans.

So what should the Hornets do right now?  First priority should be to lock up Chris Paul, the face of the franchise for years to come, to a Max Deal.  End the rumors that the Hornets might not give Paul the max extension.  That level of commitment will show the Hornets fans that the team is committed to winning.  Then start the marketing campaigns even stronger than before.  Get the faces of Paul, Chandler and Peja out there in the community so fans can relate.  Now is the time because the team is headed for a playoff spot.  Make the goal to be the best home venue for playoff games (think Golden State Warriors) from the first playoff game on.  In addition, the Hornets marketing brass needs to hatch solutions to start to relate to the LSU fans and Saints fans.  Do some cross-promo stuff with the teams to try to increase attendance.  Invite LSU basketball team into the New Orleans Coliseum for a series of home games in coming years.  Try to align themselves with the LSU community, as that rabid fanbase can give the Hornets an immediate jolt in the arm. Even consider adding a special yellow/purple uniform to be worn on unique occasions.  And before you say a uniform with LSU colors is crazy, where do you think the teal blue color originated from?  Remember the team started in Charlotte, North Carolina and was trying to appeal to fans of the Tarheels.

So I say do it now New Orleans Hornets and you can start to turn the corner towards being a dominate team in the NBA.

Official site of the New Orleans Hornets.

Posted in Attendance Figures, Improve Attendance, NBA | 2 Comments »

GoDaddy’s Super Bowl XLII stunt was genius

Posted by ZA on February 5, 2008

So have you watched GoDaddy’s “banned from Fox” Super Bowl ad yet? If not, click here to see the GoDaddy spot.

The commercial itself I’d rate as average. But the technique that GoDaddy used to lure visitors to its website was spot on. Because GoDaddy increased traffic 4x over last years Super Bowl, while spending 1/3 of the money.

They did this by promoting the commerical on their site as “banned from Fox”, during their commercial that aired during the Super Bowl. GoDaddy preyed on the human instinct that everyone wants to see the hot, new thing. And the GoDaddy commerical on their site was the hot thing on the web the last couple of days bringing almost two million hits to their site.

The 2 million hits is up from last year when they received about 500K hits. And last year GoDaddy spent to buy 3 Super Bowl spots, whereas this year they only had to pay for one commercial. In addition, GoDaddy’s spokesperson, Danica Patrick, has been one of the most searched terms this week on Yahoo Buzz. So kudos to GoDaddy for finding a smart way to spend their Super Bowl advertising dollars. I wish I could say the same for CareerBuilder or some others.

Click here to read GoDaddy CEO Bob Parson’s thoughts on the ad.

Posted in NFL, Sports Marketing | 1 Comment »

Why is Microsoft buying Yahoo?

Posted by ZA on February 5, 2008

So ever since the news came out last week that Microsoft tendered a $44 billion offer to pay Yahoo, I’ve had the same thought rattling through my brain. Why?

I understand that Microsoft (MSFT) is running a distant fourth to Google in search share. And by “distant” I mean almost non-existent, because they’d need to grow 4x to catch Yahoo and 20x to catch Google. And buying Yahoo does suddenly get them to 25% of the search share of Google. But how do the big brains in Washington figure that a 10% boost in search share is worth $44 billion dollars? The answer is, it’s not worth that much.

Search Share by ComScore
This illustration, from ComScore, shows you just how behind MSFT is in search share.

MSFT could have taken 1/10th of that money (~ $4.4B) and focused it on improving their search results and marketing their search product better. That probably wouldn’t have gotten them a 10% increase, but it would have had a better ROI. Instead MSFT choose to go for the big splash and scoop up a slumping Yahoo stock. In offering to buy Yahoo for 62% more than the recent share price shows MSFT has little clue how to innovate.

After all MSFT has always been running second to Yahoo, Google & others on the internet. Because MSFT’s cash cow still is Microsoft Office. But the web has not been nearly as profitable. MSFT showed how desperate they were to change their stripes when they bought 1% of Facebook for a cool $240M. A deal which cannot be effectively evaluated until Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook decide when they want to IPO. But make no mistakes about it, paying that much for barely a toehold of the social networking giant was all about blocking out Google.

In addition to overpaying, this current Yahoo deal sets MSFT back another year in search because it’ll take at least that long to sort out the deal. And even when the deal is approved by federal regulators, then Yahoo & MSFT still have to play nice on who’s search they are going to keep, who’s paid ad product they want to use, etc, etc. They could be bogged down for years trying to merge these two technology titans. And what will Google do during that time, aside from continue to grab more market share of search results. Well they’ll surely find new and innovative things that consumers will care about. So they’ll flank MSFT on other areas, while MSFT is stuck trying to digest its big Yahoo meal. And just like the body being its most fragile after a big meal, due to extra blood going to the stomach to help digest. So will MSFT and Yahoo become even less innovative as they try to merge, as all of their creative juices are tied up in red tape.

Bad deal for Microsoft, because they overpaid for a struggling company.
Bad deal for Yahoo, because they are now part of the scenery at Microsoft.
Irrelevant deal for Google, even they whined (see below) because they’ll keep on trucking.
Good deal for AOL, who if spun off from TimeWarner instantly become the next big acquisition target.

Could a deal by Google for AOL be coming soon? Keep an eye on this one.

Related stuff:
* Andy Beal had a nice piece on Google playing the role of hypocrite with their statement on the deal.

* Could Yahoo & Google be planning an alliance to thwart Microsoft? So says the WashingtonPost.

Posted in Internet | Leave a Comment »

There is no I in TEAM. There is no HOK in STADIUM.

Posted by ZA on February 2, 2008

Both are true statements, but it sure seems like HOK Sport is involved in every new stadium or arena being built today.  The worldclass architecture firm which specializes in designing sports venues is currently involved in major projects, that will shape the sports world, on at least four continents.  HOK Sport was once an unknown design firm in rural America, and is now the “it” company for new venue construction.  With offices around the World, this Kansas City based company is having a huge impact on how sports fans enjoy their favorite teams.  Since cutting their teeth on the Truman Sports Complex in Kansas City, HOK has played a dominant role in defining the look of the modern sports arena.

Notable HOK Sport projects:
Fedex Field (NFL)
Heinz Field (NFL)
Reliant Stadium (NFL)
University of Phoenix Stadium (NFL)
AT&T Park (MLB)
Busch Stadium (MLB)
Coors Stadium (MLB)
Minute Maid Park (MLB)
Air Canada Centre (NBA)
Toyota Center (NBA)
Estadio du Luz (Soccer)
Emirates Stadium (Soccer)
Wembley Stadium (Soccer)

Notable current/upcoming HOK Sport venue projects:
Citi Field (Mets)
Nationals Park (Nationals)
New Yankee Stadium (Yankees)
Olympic Stadium in London for 2012 Games

And these do not even scratch the surface on the numerous other HOK Sports projects that are going to shape the future sports world.  So the next time you settle into your stadium seat for the big game, look around and take in your surroundings.  And know that those surroundings are carefully planned out by companies like HOK Sports, who are helping to shape your experience at the game.

Posted in New Venues, Stadium Construction, Venue Information | 2 Comments »

Smirnoff Center now Superpages.com Center

Posted by ZA on February 1, 2008

In an on-going saga to find the ‘right’ name, the most popular amphitheatre in Dallas, Texas is changing its name again. In 1988 it opened as the Coca-Cola Starplex, a bright, gleaming example of how all concert venues should look (except for the location). Then after ten wonderful years, Coke was gone and they dropped the name down to The Starplex. That change only lasted a year until Diageo stepped up to the plate to name it the Smirnoff Music Center. And now, just 20 years after it opened. The Smirnoff Center is becoming the Superpages.com Center. And don’t forget the dotcom because it’s obvious that Superpages doesn’t want you to.

So what will having their name on the venue get Superpages?

* SP will have no trouble getting pit seats to any big touring shows that come through each Summer.
* SP will pickup regular mentions in the Dallas Observer and entertainment portion of Dallas Morning News, when the list the Summer Concert lineups.
* SP will gain a little more brand on the web as entertainment & ticket sites that list concerts will link to their name.

But that’s about it. Meaning, I do not think that Superpages.com will get value back from this investment that is equivalent to what they paid. What they paid was “not disclosed” of course, but you can bet it was a six figure deal per year. And that’s way too much to pay for an aging concert venue on the “wrong side” of downtown Dallas. Because concert venue naming deals aren’t going to get any attention outside of that specific market. At least when you pay big money to brand yourself the Staples Center, you can assure yourself some network and cable TV exposure. Superpages.com is not getting that.

Plus, who’s really using Superpages.com, Yellowbook.com or Yellowpages.com to search the web? Haven’t these people heard of GOOGLE?

Posted in Venue Naming Rights | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.